How Global Warming Alarmists Use Threats, Fraud, and Deception to Keep You

Global warming, a topic that has dominated headlines and public discourse for decades, is a subject riddled with controversy. While many people are genuinely concerned about the impact of human activity on the environment, there is a group of individuals who take advantage of these concerns, using threats, fraud, and deception to manipulate public opinion and further their own agenda.

The Global Warming Alarmists

The term "global warming alarmists" refers to individuals and organizations who propagate the belief that global warming is an imminent threat to the planet. They argue that urgent action is needed to combat climate change, often relying on scare tactics and emotional appeals to sway public opinion.

Red Hot Lies: How Global Warming Alarmists Use Threats, Fraud, and Deception to Keep You Misinformed

by Christopher C. Horner(Kindle Edition)

4.5 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	1077 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	418 pages
Screen Reader	:	Supported

FREE

One of the most common tactics used by these alarmists is to highlight the potential consequences of global warming. They often exaggerate the severity and immediacy of these consequences, instilling fear in the public and creating a sense of urgency. This fear is then used to justify their proposed solutions, which often involve significant policy changes and increased government control over various industries.

Manipulating Data and Hiding the Truth

Another method employed by these alarmists is the manipulation of scientific data. By selectively choosing data sets or cherry-picking specific studies that support their narrative, they create an illusion of consensus among scientists. In reality, the scientific community is far from unanimous on the causes and extent of global warming.

Furthermore, alarmists frequently hide dissenting opinions and dissenting research, preventing a balanced and objective evaluation of the evidence. Scientific journals and mainstream media outlets often present only one side of the argument, further perpetuating the notion that there is a consensus among scientists.

Alarmists vs. Skeptics

It is important to distinguish between global warming alarmists and skeptics. While alarmists advocate for immediate and drastic action to combat climate change, skeptics question the extent to which human activity contributes to global warming and raise concerns about the effectiveness of proposed solutions.

Skeptics often face backlash and are labeled as "climate change deniers." This label, deliberately used to vilify and silence opposing viewpoints, stifles open and unbiased debate on the topic. It is essential to encourage healthy skepticism and allow for diverse opinions in order to arrive at the truth.

The Financial Motive

Behind the alarmist movement, there is often a significant financial motive. Many organizations and individuals involved in spreading alarmist propaganda have financial interests tied to the global warming narrative. Renewable energy companies, for example, stand to benefit greatly from policies that promote the use of alternative energy sources.

By perpetuating the fear of global warming, these organizations can secure government subsidies, grants, and other financial benefits. They have a vested interest in maintaining the narrative that immediate action is needed, often at the expense of scientific integrity and the truth.

Countering the Alarmist Agenda

To counter the alarmist agenda, it is important to critically evaluate the information presented to us. We must question the motives of those who seek to manipulate public opinion and educate ourselves about the science behind global warming.

By promoting open and unbiased discussion, encouraging scientific research that explores all possible causes of global warming, and ensuring transparency in the dissemination of information, we can separate the genuine concerns about the environment from the fearmongering and manipulation perpetuated by alarmists.

Global warming alarmists exploit public concerns about the environment in order to further their own agenda. Through threats, fraud, and deception, they use fear and emotional appeals to sway public opinion and push for policy changes that benefit their financial interests. It is crucial to remain vigilant, question the information we are presented with, and encourage open and unbiased dialogue on this important global issue.

Red Hot Lies: How Global Warming Alarmists Use Threats, Fraud, and Deception to Keep You Misinformed

by Christopher C. Horner(Kindle Edition)

4.5 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	1077 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	418 pages
Screen Reader	:	Supported

FREE

Liars--Al Gore, the United Nations, the New York Times. The global warming lobby, relentless in its push for bigger government, more spending, and more regulation, will use any means necessary to scare you out of your wits--as well as your tax dollars and your liberties--with threats of rising oceans, deadly droughts, and unspeakable future consequences of "climate change." In pursuing their anti-energy, anti-capitalist, and pro-government agenda, the global warming alarmists--and unscrupulous scientists who see this scare as their gravy train to federal grants and foundation money--resort to dirty tricks, smear campaigns, and outright lies, abandoning scientific standards, journalistic integrity, and the old-fashioned notions of free speech and open debate. In Red Hot Lies, bestselling author Christopher Horner--himself the target of Greenpeace dirty tricks and alarmist smears--exposes the dark underbelly of the environmental movement. Power-hungry politicians blacklist scientists who reject global warming alarmism. U.S. senators threaten companies that fund climate change dissenters. Mainstream media outlets openly reject the notion of "balance." The occasional unguarded scientist candidly admits the need to twist the facts to paint an uglier picture in order to keep the faucet of government money flowing. In the name of "saving the planet," anything goes. But why the nasty tactics? Why the cover ups, lies, and intimidation? Because Al Gore and his ilk want to use big government at the local, state, federal, and global level to run your life, and they can brook no opposition. But the actual facts, as Red Hot Lies makes clear, aren't nearly as scary as their fiction.